Equality vs. Athletics Essay -- Title IX Sports Women Essays

comparability vs. AthleticsIn 1929, the 19th A mendment gave women the rightly to vote. This was a breakthrough for America and an enormous step towards equal opportunities for women everywhere. Being given the right to vote created a sense of long awaited and greatly deserved equality with men. Even though women were given the right to vote, over 70 age ago, the government silent has to make a law to ensure that equal treatment is given. gentle IX was instated in 1972 to provide women with the same athletic opportunities as men in universities across the United States. While Title IX has helped advance female athletics, there are arguments that it has discriminated against male athletics. Attorney Curt Levey makes a drastically influence argument against Title IX in his article, Title IXs drear Side Sports Gender Quotas. The argument focuses on the pressures of upper level schools complying with Title IXs equaliser rule, the lack of female interest in intercollegiate athletics, and the bitter cutting of several mens teams since Title IX was established. Levey, along with many others opposed to Title IX, seem to think the law is slowly destroying male athletics, which was non what it was intended for and definitely is not the case. Title IX was created in order to provide women with equal opportunities in intercollegiate athletics, and that is exactly what it has d single so far and what it will continue to do.Leveys first line of work with Title IX and its attempt to increase womens athletic opportunities, found in paragraph four, is directed towards the proportionality rule (Levey 626). The proportionality rule is whizz of three options schools are given to comply with Title IX. This requires high schools, colleges, and u... ...een sitting on the bench for years, and now its time for men to take one for the team.Work CitedBestwick, Dick. Title IXs proportionality rule is patently unfair to men. AthensBanner-Herald. 2 Feb. 2003. 16 A pr. 2003. Levey, Curt. Title IXs Dark Side Sports Gender Quotas. Good Reasons with Contemporary Arguments. Needham Heights Pearson, 2001.626-627. Rpt. in The Humanist.The National Coalition for Women and Girls in Education. Title IX at 30 Report dining table of Gender Equity. June 2002. The National Coalition for Women and Girls in Education. Title IX Athletics Policies Issues and Data for Education Decision Makers. Aug 27. 2002.The Secretary of Educations Commission on Opportunity in Athletics. Open to All Title IX at Thirty. Feb 28. 2003. Equality vs. Athletics Essay -- Title IX Sports Women EssaysEquality vs. AthleticsIn 1929, the 19th Amendment gave women the right to vote. This was a breakthrough for America and an enormous step towards equal opportunities for women everywhere. Being given the right to vote created a sense of long awaited and greatly deserved equality with men. Even though women were given the right to vote, over 70 years ago, the government still has to make a law to ensure that equal treatment is given. Title IX was instated in 1972 to provide women with the same athletic opportunities as men in universities across the United States. While Title IX has helped advance female athletics, there are arguments that it has discriminated against male athletics. Attorney Curt Levey makes a drastically bias argument against Title IX in his article, Title IXs Dark Side Sports Gender Quotas. The argument focuses on the pressures of upper level schools complying with Title IXs proportionality rule, the lack of female interest in intercollegiate athletics, and the bitter cutting of several mens teams since Title IX was established. Levey, along with many others opposed to Title IX, seem to think the law is slowly destroying male athletics, which was not what it was intended for and definitely is not the case. Title IX was created in order to provide women with equal opportunities in intercollegiate athletics, and that is exa ctly what it has done so far and what it will continue to do.Leveys first problem with Title IX and its attempt to increase womens athletic opportunities, found in paragraph four, is directed towards the proportionality rule (Levey 626). The proportionality rule is one of three options schools are given to comply with Title IX. This requires high schools, colleges, and u... ...een sitting on the bench for years, and now its time for men to take one for the team.Work CitedBestwick, Dick. Title IXs proportionality rule is patently unfair to men. AthensBanner-Herald. 2 Feb. 2003. 16 Apr. 2003. Levey, Curt. Title IXs Dark Side Sports Gender Quotas. Good Reasons with Contemporary Arguments. Needham Heights Pearson, 2001.626-627. Rpt. in The Humanist.The National Coalition for Women and Girls in Education. Title IX at Thirty ReportCard of Gender Equity. June 2002. The National Coalition for Women and Girls in Education. Title IX Athletics Policies Issues and Data for Education Dec ision Makers. Aug 27. 2002.The Secretary of Educations Commission on Opportunity in Athletics. Open to All Title IX at Thirty. Feb 28. 2003.